4.3 Article

A motivational counseling approach to improving heart failure self-care - Mechanisms of effectiveness

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 232-241

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005082-200605000-00012

关键词

heart failure; mixed methods; motivational interviewing; naturalistic decision-making; patient education; self-care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Self-care is an integral component of successful heart failure (HF) management. Engaging patients in self-care can be challenging. Methods: Fifteen patients with HF enrolled during hospitalization received a motivational intervention designed to improve HF self-care. A mixed method, pretest posttest design was used to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom the intervention was beneficial and the mechanism of effectiveness. Participants received, on average, 3.0 +/- 1.5 home visits (median 3, mode 3, range 1-6) over a three-month period from an advanced practice nurse trained in motivational interviewing and family counseling. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to judge individual patients in whom the intervention produced a clinically significant improvement in HF self-care. Audiotaped intervention sessions were analyzed using qualitative methods to assess the mechanism of intervention effectiveness. Results: Congruence between quantitative and qualitative judgments of improved self-care revealed that 71.4% of participants improved in self-care after receiving the intervention. Analysis of transcribed intervention sessions revealed themes of 1) communication (reflective listening, empathy); 2) making it fit (acknowledging cultural beliefs, overcoming barriers and constraints, negotiating an action plan); and, 3) bridging the transition from hospital to home (providing information, building skills, activating support resources). Conclusion: An intervention that incorporates the core elements of motivational interviewing may be effective in improving HF self-care, but further research is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据