4.5 Article

Caloric restriction and mitochondrial function in the ageing myocardium

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 525-531

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.02.001

关键词

mitochondria; ageing; caloric restriction; mitochondrial DNA polymerase; neuregulin; nitric oxide; Bcl-x

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extension of life span by caloric restriction is assumed to result from retardation of a genetically determined program of ageing, but the new concept of hormesis regards caloric restriction as mild stress, which triggers active, protective reactions with reparative capacities. Here, we discuss two potential hormetic reactions with protective efficacy against dysfunctional mitochondria: restoration of neuregulin signalling by upregulation of erbB receptors and enhanced biogenesis of functionally active mitochondria by an eNOS-dependent mechanism. Mitochondrial ageing is considered to result from a vicious cycle of mitochondrial ROS-formation, ROS-mediated damage of mitochondrial DNA, disproportional respiratory chain composition and thereby additionally enhanced ROS production leading to apoptotic cell loss. Proof-of-principle for such a cycle was obtained from transgenic mice with impaired mitochondrial DNA repair capacity. Indirect arguments suggest this cycle operating also in ageing wild-type mammals, accelerated by downregulation of mitochondrial gene expression in insulin resistance, by inflammatory excess NO formation, and by downregulation of erbB receptors in cardiac ageing and failure. Attenuated neuregulin signalling induces a shift in the splice products of the Bcl-x gene from the antiapoptotic Bcl-xL protein towards the proapoptotic Bcl-xS protein, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Transient caloric restriction upregulates erbB receptors and restores mitochondrial Bcl-x-isoform patterns and mitochondrial dysfunction in the ageing heart. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据