4.4 Article

Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of the DSM-IV and five-factor models

期刊

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 298-308

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.298

关键词

personality disorder; dimensional; alternative; Ted Bundy; psychopathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical utility, or the usefulness of a diagnostic system in clinical practice, has been identified as an important construct in proposed revisions to the diagnostic nomenclature and a significant limitation of dimensional models of personality disorder, such as the 5-factor model (FFM). Only 1 study to date has addressed explicitly the clinical utility of the FFM, and the findings suggested significant limitations. In the current study, 245 practicing psychologists described 3 historic cases using both the FFM and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and then rated each model on 6 aspects of clinical utility. In contrast to prior research, the psychologists in this study considered the FFM to have greater clinical utility than the existing diagnostic categories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据