4.3 Article

Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 337-344

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.001

关键词

calibration; finite element analysis; intervertebral disc; validation; optimization procedure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Major deficits of many finite element models of the lumbar spine are the oversimplification, assumed constellation of the material properties or the insufficiently performed calibration using experimental in vitro data. The aim of this study was, to develop a method for calibrating the two-composite structure of the annulus fibrosus, the ground substance and collagen fibers. Methods. For that purpose, a three-dimensional, non-linear finite element model of a denucleated intervertebral disc with the adjacent vertebral bodies (L4-L5) was created. Previously performed in vitro experiments provided experimental data for the range of motion in each load direction, needed for calibration. A method was developed to determine the individual contribution of the fibers and the ground substance for bending moments with four different magnitudes (2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 N m). For each bending moment, the stillness of fibers was varied to approximate the Young's modulus of the ground substance in order to fulfil the required range of motion obtained from in vitro results within an accuracy of 99%. Results. Infinite material parameter combinations of collagen fibers and ground substance led to the same range of motion, which were different for each bending moment. However, there was only one combination, which was valid for all applied bending moments; and in all load direction. Interpretation. This calibration method was performed on range of motion data; however, the procedure could also be applied to other loading scenarios and measurement parameters like disc bulge, translation and intradiscal pressure. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据