4.7 Article

99Tc-HYNIC-annexin VSPECT imaging of acute stroke and its response to neuroprotective therapy with anti-Fas ligand antibody

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-0046-6

关键词

Tc-99m-HYNIC-annexin V; ischemic injury; acute stroke; SPECT; anti-FasL antibody

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB000898] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS40516] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The first aim of the study was to determine whether Tc-99m-HYNIC-annexin V, a marker of cellular stress and apoptosis, can detect ischemic injury in patients with acute stroke. Secondly, we wished to test radiolabeled annexin's ability to monitor therapy in a rodent model of focal ischemic injury. Methods: SPECT imaging of patients was performed between 1 and 2 h after intravenous injection of 30 mCi (1,110 MBq) of tracer. Eight MFL4 (anti-FasL) antibody-treated (400 mu g i.p. days 0 and 3) and 21 control adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent small animal SPECT imaging with 5-10 mCi (185-370 MBq) of tracer, 1 and 6 days after a 2-h intraluminal thread occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery. Results: Two patients with acute stroke had regions of multifocal annexin uptake that correlated with sites of restricted diffusion on MRI. Anti-FasL antibody treatment significantly reduced annexin uptake by 92% with a 60% decrease in the number of caspase-8 staining (apoptotic) neurons on day 1. On day 6, treated animals had an 80% reduction in tracer uptake with a 75% decrease in infarct size as compared with controls. Annexin uptake in controls and treated animals (day 6) linearly correlated with infarct size (r(2)=0.603, p=0.0036) and the number of TUNEL-positive (apoptotic) nuclei (r(2)=0.728, p=0.00084). Conclusion: Annexin imaging shows foci of increased uptake at sites of ischemic injury in patients with acute stroke. Annexin imaging can assess the effects of therapy for ischemic cerebral injury in rats, suggesting its potential as a non-invasive indicator of drug efficacy in future clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据