4.5 Article

Rad18 regulates DNA polymerase κ and is required for recovery from S-phase checkpoint-mediated arrest

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 3527-3540

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.9.3527-3540.2006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES09558, R01 ES012917, ES12917, R01 ES009558, R29 ES009558] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated mechanisms that recruit the translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerase Pol kappa to stalled replication forks. The DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA is monoubiquitinated and interacts with Pol kappa in cells treated with the bulky adduct-forming genotoxin benzo[a]pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE). A monoubiquitination-defective mutant form of PCNA fails to interact with Pol kappa. Small interfering RNA-mediated downregulation of the E3 ligase Rad18 inhibits BPDE-induced PCNA ubiquitination and association between PCNA and Pol kappa. Conversely, overexpressed Rad18 induces PCNA ubiquitination and association between PCNA and Pol kappa in a DNA damage-independent manner. Therefore, association of Pol kappa with PCNA is regulated by Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitination. Cells from Rad18(-/-) transgenic mice show defective recovery from BPDE-induced S-phase checkpoints. In Rad18(-/-) cells, BPDE induces elevated and persistent activation of checkpoint kinases, indicating persistently stalled forks due to defective TLS. Rad18-deficient cells show reduced viability after BPDE challenge compared with wild-type cells (but survival after hydroxyurea or ionizing radiation treatment is unaffected by Rad18 deficiency). Inhibition of RPA/ATR/Chk1-mediated S-phase checkpoint signaling partially inhibited BPDE-induced PCNA ubiquitination and prevented interactions between PCNA and Pol kappa. Taken together, our results indicate that ATR/Chk1 signaling is required for Rad18-mediated PCNA monoubiquitination. Recruitment of Pol kappa to ubiquitinated PCNA enables lesion bypass and eliminates stalled forks, thereby attenuating the S-phase checkpoint.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据