4.5 Article

Behavioural uniformity as a response to cues of predation risk

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 1013-1019

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When confronted with a predator, individuals often alter their behaviour to minimize predation risk. To investigate behavioural changes induced by predator presence and light in a zooplankton species, we video-recorded the swimming behaviour of waterfleas, Daphnia pulicaria. Chemical cues from two predators with different hunting techniques (a visual predator: bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus; and a tactile predator: phantom midge larvae, Chaoborus sp.) were used in two sets of experiments. We filmed Daphnia individually in either control or predator-treated water, in a light or dark environment (four treatments in total) and recorded swimming speed, hop rate, sink rate and net angle of swimming. All swimming parameters in the fish experiment and two in the Chaoborus sp. experiment changed significantly between treatments. The coefficient of variation (CV) of all parameters except sink rate decreased significantly in the presence of light and/or a predator. In the presence of light, CV values declined by at least two-fold in both fish and Cliaoborus experiments, while the changes in CV values between treatments varied depending on the type of predator used in the experiment. Waterfleas increased their swimming uniformity while isolated from other individuals. We therefore conclude that this swimming behaviour pattern is based on individual perception of both kairomones and light in the environment rather than on social interactions. Our results suggest that uniformity in swimming behaviour may be an important defence mechanism in zooplankton, aiming to minimize oddity among group members in order to decrease predation risk. (c) 2006 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据