4.5 Article

Age effect on HSP70: Decreased resistance to ischemic and oxidative stress in HDF

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 32-39

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.09.019

关键词

heat pre-conditioning; chronic wounds; aging; HSP70; ischemia; oxidative stress

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Heat pre-conditioning results in induction of heat shock proteins including HSP70 that gives a cytoprotective effect against further stress. However, HSP70 induction is attenuated in aged cells. The lower HSP70-levels may contribute to the impaired stress response seen in the aged, and to the higher rates of chronic wounds in aged, which arise from repeated ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible connection by comparing the viability of heat pre-conditioned aged versus young human dermal fibroblasts (RDF) after exposure to stress. Materials and methods. Young (15-28) and aged (6177) HDF were heat pre-conditioned (42 degrees C, 1 h) and after recovery (1, 2, or 20 h) treated with carbonyl-cyanide-m-chlorophenythydrazone (hypoxic stress) or with hydrogen peroxide (oxidative stress) for 1 h. HSP70 levels were determined by Western blot. Cell damage was assessed by quantifying lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) in conditioned media. Aged HDF were transfected with HSP70-plasmid, consecutively heat preconditioned and exposed to oxidative stress. Results. HSP70 increased in heat pre-conditioned young HDF by 96, 189, and 237% after 1, 2, and 20-h recovery, respectively, and in aged HDF by 27,61, and 26%. LDH-release was only decreased in young HDF 20-h after heat-treatment compared with non-heat treated cells (P < 0.001). HSP70-transfection of aged HDF with plasmid reduced LDH-release by 29%. Conclusions. Heat pre-conditioning fails to protect aged HDF to oxidative or hypoxic stress due in part to impaired HSP70 induction compared to young. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据