4.6 Article

Annual variation in photo acclimation and photoprotection of the photobiont in the foliose lichen Xanthoria parietina

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.12.019

关键词

chlorophyll fluorescence; non-photochemical quenching; parictin; photoinhibition; seasonal dynamics; zeaxanthin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal variation in maximal photochemical quantum yield (F-V/F-M) of photosystem II (PS II), light adapted quantum yield (phi(II)) of PS II non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), contents of chlorophylls, and xanthophyll cycle pigments (VAZ) was studied in Xanthoria parietina repeatedly sampled in one location in S Norway during one year. The seasonal course in the susceptibility to photoinhibition was evaluated as high light-induced changes (1800 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1) for 24 h) in FVFM, phi(II), and NPQ measured as the ability to recover after 2 and 20 h at low light in control thalli with a natural cortical parietin screen, and in thalli from which parietin had been removed prior to high light exposures. F-V/F-M, phi(II), chlorophyll content, and the conversion state of VAZ (DEPS) reached minimum ill spring. At the same time, yearly maxima of VAZ content and NPQ were recorded. Thereafter, F-V/F-M,F- phi(II), and chlorophyll content increased gradually, reaching maximum values in late autumn. DEPS peaked already in summer. Similarly, VAZ and NPQ decreased from early summer until winter. All data show that the X. parietina photobiont acclimates to seasonal changes in solar radiation, consistent with the lichen's preference for well-lit habitats. However, a comparison with a study of seasonal acclimation in the X parietina mycobiont shows that in order to understand the seasonal photobiont acclimation, one has to consider the seasonal variation in internal screening caused by the fungal regulation of the PAR-absorbing parietin. A joint effort of both bionts seems to be required to avoid serious photoinhibition. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据