4.5 Article

Combining pharmacological mobilization with intramyocardial delivery of bone marrow cells over-expressing VEGF is more effective for cardiac repair

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.02.004

关键词

angiogenesis; bone marrow stem cells; cytokines; heart infarction; myocyte regeneration

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-74272, HL080686, HL-081859-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We postulated that combining cell based hVEGF165 gene delivery with cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow cells (BMC) may give better prognosis in an infarcted heart. Forty-eight myoabalated female C57BL/6J mice (20-25 g) received 1 X 10(6) BMC from transgenic GFP+ male mice. One month later, acute myocardial infarction (MI) model was developed by coronary artery ligation. Animals were grouped (N = 12) to receive intramyocardial injections of 10 mu l DMEM without cells (group 1; group 2) or with 1 x 10(5) mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) over-expressing hVEGF 165 (group 3; group 4). The animals received either cytokine therapy (group 2 and 4) or saline solution (group 1 and 3) for 7 days after MI. Hemodynamic data were obtained 4 weeks after MI using Millar's P-V system and cardiac tissue was harvested for immunohistological studies. We observed regeneration and extensive Survival of BMC in and around the infarcted myocardium in groups 3 and 4. Blood vessel density was markedly enhanced in group 4 as compared with groups 1 and 2 in peti-infarct area. Fibrotic area was significantly reduced with improved LV-contractile function in group 2 and 4. LV-systolic and diastolic functions were well-preserved in group 4 as indicated by +dP/dt, -dP/dt and Tau (glantz). We therefore conclude that transplantation of MSC overexpressing VEGF combined with cytokine induced BMC mobilization is superior to either of the monotherapy approach for angiomyogenesis and LV-function recovery. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据