4.5 Review

CRH-BP: the regulation and function of a phylogenetically conserved binding protein

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 1878-1891

出版社

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/1931

关键词

binding protein; corticotropin releasing hormone; CRH; urocortin; HPA axis; HPG axis; evolution; stress; anxiety; brain; pituitary gland; review

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD07048] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32 DC05341] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK42730, DK57660] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [F31 NS 048775] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corticotropin Releasing Hormone-Binding Protein (CRH-BP), a 37kDa secreted glycoprotein, binds both CRH and urocortin with high affinity and is structurally unrelated to the CRH receptors. CRH-BP orthologues have been identified in multiple invertebrate and vertebrate species. It is strongly conserved throughout evolution, suggesting the maintenance of a structural conformation necessary for biological activity. CRH-BP is an important modulator of CRH activity; it inhibits CRH-induced ACTH secretion from pituitary corticotropes and may exert similar actions at central sites of CRH release. While the function of CRH-BP is thought to be primarily inhibitory, recent studies indicate that novel functional roles may exist in both the brain and pituitary. Regulation of CRH-BP expression by stress and metabolic factors are consistent with in vivo models of altered CRH-BP expression. Positive regulation of pituitary CRH-BP by reproductive hormones suggests that additional interactions between the stress and reproductive axes may exist. While recent research has focused on the evolutionary conservation, expanded sites of expression, regulation and in vivo function of CRH-BP, a more complete understanding of the central and peripheral functions of CRH-BP and its mechanisms of action will help elucidate its potential role in the etiology or treatment of disorders of CRH dysregulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据