4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Nongenomic effects of progesterone on the contraction of muscle cells from the guinea pig colon

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00382.2005

关键词

calcium release; desenitization of progesterone; colonic circlular muscle cells

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK 52911, R01 DK 36588, DK 34854, R01 DK 27389] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Progesterone (PG) affects muscle cells by genomic mechanisms through nuclear receptors and by nongenomic mechanisms through unidentified pathways. This study aimed to determine the pathways mediating its nongenomic actions. Experiments were performed in dissociated muscle cells from guinea pig colons. Nongenomic actions were defined as those occurring within 10 min of PG exposure. PG blocked the contraction to CCK-8 and NKA (10(-7) M) but did not impair ACh (10(-7) M) and KCl (2.5 x 10(-2) M)-induced contraction. Both CCK-8 and NKA contract muscle cells by releasing calcium from intracellular stores, whereas ACh and KCl can utilize extracellular calcium. PG also blocked the contraction induced by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, thapsigargin, and caffeine, agents that contract muscle cells by releasing calcium from storage sites. The nongenomic actions of PG were transient because they were absent 1 h after the first PG dose, remaining unresponsive after a second PG dose was administered. Furthermore, PG had no effect on the contraction induced by CCK-8 and thapsigargin in muscle cells from animals pretreated with daily intramuscular PG for 4 days. Cytosolic incorporation experiments of [H-3]PG showed that pretreatment with unlabeled PG significantly reduced the radiolabeled PG incorporation in the cytosol. We conclude that the nongenomic actions of PG on colonic muscle cells transiently blocked calcium release from storage sites, and this response became rapidly desensitized. This effect does not appear to be specific to PG because other steroid hormones such as aldosterone and testosterone can also induce it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据