4.5 Article

Increased oxidative stress and oxidative damage associated with chronic bacterial prostatitis

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 317-323

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00144.x

关键词

chronic bacterial prostatitis; oxidative stress; oxidative damage; free radicals; oxidation; lipid peroxidation; antioxidant; antioxidative enzyme; nitric oxide; malondialdehyde

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To investigate whether chronic bacterial prostatitis might increase oxidative stress and oxidative damage in chronic bacterial prostatitis patients (CBPP), and to explore its possible mechanism. Methods: Enrolled in a case-control study were 70 randomly sampled CBPP and 70 randomly sampled healthy adult volunteers (HAV), on whom plasma nitric oxide (NO), vitamin C (VC), vitamin E (VE) and P-carotene (P-CAR) level, erythrocyte malondialdehyde (MDA) level, as well as erythrocyte superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activities were determined by spectrophotometry. Results: Compared with the HAV group, values of plasma NO and erythrocyte MDA in the CBPP group were significantly increased (P < 0.001); those of plasma VC, VE and P-CAR as well as erythrocyte SOD, CAT and GPX activities in the CBPP group were significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Findings from partial correlation for the 70 CBPP showed that with prolonged course of disease, values of NO and MDA were gradually increased (P < 0.001), and those of VC, VE, P Cr-CAR, SOD, CAT and GPX were gradually decreased (P < 0.05-0.00 1). The findings from stepwise regression for the 70 CBPP suggested that the model was Y = -13.2077 + 0.1894 MDA C, 4:1 +0.0415NO - 0.1999GPX, F = 18.2047, P < 0.001, r = 0.6729, P < 0.001. Conclusion: The findings suggest that there exist increased oxidative stress and oxidative damage induced by chronic bacterial prostatitis in the patients, and such phenomenon was closely related to the course of disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据