4.3 Article

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation in a gastrostomy-fed infant rat model

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000221905.68781.4a

关键词

probiotics; intestinal inflammation; cytokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: A gastrostomy-fed rat infant pup-in-a-cup model was used to test the hypothesis that enterally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) decreases the proinflammatory response induced by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the developing infant rat small intestine, plasma, lung and liver. Methods: Two groups of 6- to 7-day-old pups were fed a rat milk substitute with LPS added via the gastrostomy tube for 6 days. One of the rat milk substitute-fed groups received supplemental LGG; another group received LPS without LGG. Age-matched mother-fed rat pups were used as controls. Results: LPS treatment blunted body growth, but LGG supplementation had no effect on weight increments. LGG decreased LPS-induced inflammation in intestinal tissue; CINC-1 (rodent IL-8 equivalent) production in plasma, liver, lung and distal small intestine; and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) production in plasma and lung. Cytokine multiplex assay showed lung interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, growth-related oncogene (GRO)/KC (rat CINC-1) and TNF-alpha were significantly higher in gastrostomy-fed, LPS-treated pups than in mother-reared pups, and LGG significantly blunted the LPS-induced elevation of IL-1 beta, IL-10, IL-18, GRO/KC and TNF-alpha; liver GRO/KC was significantly higher in gastrostomy-fed, LPS-treated Pups than in mother-reared pups, and LGG significantly blunted the LPS-induced elevation of GRO/KC. Conclusions: LGG provided by the enteral route is able to downregulate LPS-induced proinflammatory mediators. This effect is not only present in the splanchnic organs, that is, the intestine and the liver, but extends to the plasma and a distal organ, the lung.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据