Conversion of a CHO cell culture process from perfusion to fed-batch technology without altering product quality

During the development of a new drug product, it is a common strategy to develop a first-generation process with the aim to rapidly produce material for pre-clinical and early stage clinical trials. At a later stage of the development, a second-generation process is then introduced with the aim to supply late-stage clinical trials as well as market needs. This work was aimed at comparing the performance of two different CHO cell culture processes (perfusion and fed-batch) used for the production of a therapeutically active recombinant glycoprotein at industrial pilot-scale. The first-generation process was based on the Fibra-Cel (R) packed-bed perfusion technology. It appeared during the development of the candidate drug that high therapeutic doses were required (> 100 mg per dose), and that future market demand would exceed 100 kg per year. This exceeded by far the production capacity of the first-generation process, and triggered a change of technology from a packed-bed perfusion process with limited scale-up capabilities to a fed-batch process with scale-up potential to typical bioreactor sizes of 15 m(3) or more. The productivity per bioreactor unit volume (in product m(-3) year(-1)) of the fed-batch process was about 70% of the level reached with the first-generation perfusion process. However, since the packed-bed perfusion system was limited in scale (0.6 in 3 maximum) compared to the volumes reached in suspension cultures (15 in 3), the fed-batch was selected as second-generation process. In fact, the overall process performance (in product year(-1)) was about 18-fold higher for the fed-batch compared to the perfusion mode. Data from perfusion and fed-batch harvests samples indicated that comparable product quality (relative abundance of monomers dimers and aggregates; N-glycan sialylation level; isoform's distribution) was obtained in both processes. To further confirm this observation, purification to homogeneity of the harvest material from both processes, followed by a complementary set of studies (e.g. full physico-chemical characterization, assessment of in vitro and in vivo bioactivity, comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies in relevant species, etc.) would be required.