4.6 Article

An N-terminal sequence targets and tethers Na+ pump α2 subunits to specialized plasma membrane microdomains

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 18, 页码 12929-12940

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507450200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-45215] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-58888, R01 GM058888] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-16106] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium pumps (alpha B dimers) with the alpha 1 isoform of the catalytic (alpha) subunit are expressed in all cells. Additionally, most cells express Na+ pumps with a second alpha isoform. For example, astrocytes and arterial myocytes also express Na+ pumps with the alpha 2 isoform. The alpha 2 pumps localize to plasma membrane ( PM) microdomains overlying junctional sarco-/endoplasmic reticulum (S/ER), but the alpha 1 pumps are more uniformly distributed. To study alpha 2 targeting, we expressed alpha 1/alpha 2 and alpha 2/alpha 1 chimeras and 1-90 and 1-120 amino acid N-terminal peptides in primary cultured mouse astrocytes. Immunocytochemistry revealed that alpha 2/alpha 1 ( but not alpha 1/alpha 2) chimeras markedly reduced native alpha 2 (i.e. were dominant negatives). N-terminal (1-120 and 1-90 amino acids) alpha 2 ( and alpha 3), but not alpha 1 peptides also targeted to the PM-S/ER junctions and were dominant negative for native alpha 2 in astrocytes and arterial myocytes. Thus alpha 2 and alpha 3 have the same targeting sequence. Ca2+ (fura-2) signals in astrocytes expressing the 1-90 alpha 2 peptide were comparable to signals in cells from alpha 2 null mutants (i.e. functionally dominant negative): 1 mu M ATP-evoked Ca2+ transients were augmented, and 100 nM ouabain-induced amplification was abolished. Amino acid substitutions in the 1-120 alpha 1 and alpha 2 constructs, and in full-length alpha 1, revealed that Leu-27 and Ala-35 are essential for targeting/tethering the constructs to PM-S/ER junctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据