4.8 Article

Polymorphism in the β2-adrenergic receptor and lipoprotein lipase genes as risk determinants for idiopathic venous thromboembolism -: A multilocus, population-based, prospective genetic analysis

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 113, 期 18, 页码 2193-2200

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615401

关键词

genetics; multilocus; polymorphisms; risk factors; venous thromboembolism

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58755, HL-63293] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - Candidate genes in inflammation, thrombosis, coagulation, and lipid metabolism pathways have been implicated in venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods and Results - Using DNA samples collected at baseline in the Physicians' Health Study cohort, we genotyped 92 polymorphisms from 56 candidate genes among 304 individuals who subsequently developed VTE (144 idiopathic, 156 secondary cases) and among 2070 individuals who remained free of reported vascular disease over a mean follow-up of 13.2 years to prospectively determine whether these gene polymorphisms contribute to the risk of VTE. For idiopathic VTE, in addition to the factor V (Leiden) mutation (odds ratio [OR], 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24 to 8.14; P < 0.0001; false discovery rate [FDR], P < 0.0001), an N291S lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphism (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.56 to 6.09; P = 0.001; FDR, P = 0.036) and a Q27E beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.79; P = 0.006; FDR, P = 0.036) were found to be significantly associated with increased risk. For secondary VTE, a Q360H apolipoprotein A4 gene polymorphism (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.65; P = 0.001; FDR, P = 0.07) and an I50V interleukin-4 receptor polymorphism (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.84; P = 0.0009; FDR, P = 0.07) were moderately, but not statistically and significantly, associated with reduced risk after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Conclusions - These present findings are hypothesis generating and require replication and confirmation in an independent investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据