4.7 Review

The influence of high-efficiency particulate air filtration on mortality and fungal infection among highly immunosuppressed patients:: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 193, 期 10, 页码 1408-1418

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/503435

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Patients with hematological malignancies who are treated with intensive chemotherapy or who receive bone marrow transplants are exposed to an increased risk of developing nosocomial fungal infections. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of high-efficiency particulate air ( HEPA) filtration with that of non-HEPA filtration in decreasing the rates of mortality and fungal infection among patients with diagnosed hematological malignancies and neutropenia or among patients with bone marrow transplants. Methods. Articles identified in a Medline search, guidelines, and books, as well as the bibliographies of review articles, monographs, and the articles identified by Medline, were researched. Randomized trials and observational studies comparing HEPA filtration with conventional room ventilation were selected for inclusion in the present review. Results. Sixteen trials ( 9 with death as an outcome and 10 with fungal infection as an outcome) that compared HEPA filtration with non-HEPA filtration were selected for meta-analyses. We discovered no significant advantages of HEPA filtration in the prevention of death among patients with hematological malignancies with severe neutropenia in randomized controlled trials ( RCTs; relative risk [ RR], 0.86 [ 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.65 - 1.14]) and in studies of a lower standard ( non-RCTs; RR, 0.87 [ 95% CI, 0.60 - 1.25]). Conclusions. The placement in protected areas of patients with hematological malignancies with severe neutropenia or patients with bone marrow transplants appears to be beneficial, but no definitive conclusion could be drawn from the data available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据