4.8 Article

Hydrothermal stability of CuZSM5 catalyst in reducing NO by NH3 for the urea selective catalytic reduction process

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 240, 期 1, 页码 47-57

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.03.001

关键词

urea SCR; deactivation; hydrothermal stability; ESR; XAFS; CuZSM5

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To confirm the hydrothermal stability of CuZSM5 for Urea selective catalytic reduction (SCR), NO removal activity over a series of the catalyst containing various amounts of copper ranging from 1 to 5 wt%, was examined before and after hydrothermal treatment under a simulated feed, as stream containing 10% water at a temperature range of 600-800 degrees C. The degree of catalyst aging varies with respect to the copper content of the catalyst and the aging, temperature. The optimal copper content seems to be about 4 wt% (nearly 125% in terms of ion-exchange level) from the standpoint of catalyst aging. The catalysts before and after aging were characterized by XRD, Al-27-MAS-NMR, BET, XAFS, and ESR to gain insight into the sintering mechanism of CuZSM5 for the urea SCR process. A slight alteration of the catalyst structure was observed by XRD and BET analysis on catalyst aging. The copper ions on the surface of CuZSM5 catalysts on aging remained as either isolated Cu2+ and/or an oxide form of copper, as confirmed by EXAFS. However, ESR spectra of the catalysts clearly revealed four distinct local Structures of Cu2+ species in the framework of ZSM5 in the form of a square pyramidal site, a square planar site, and two unresolved distorted sites. Migration of Cu2+ ions from the square pyramidal and/or the square planar sites of the isolated cupric ions to the two unresolved sites occurs during hydrothermal treatment. This causes an alteration of the population of isolated cupric ions on the square pyramidal and/or planar sites and is responsible for the hydrothermal stability of the CuZSM5 catalyst in the urea SCR process. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据