4.7 Article

Phase II study of single-agent panitumumab in patients with incurable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 2047-2052

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu368

关键词

cutaneous; squamous cell carcinoma; panitumumab

类别

资金

  1. Amgen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is quite common, there are few prospective trials regarding its optimal management. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-agent panitumumab in the treatment of patients with CSCC not suitable for local therapy. Patients and methods: Sixteen patients received single-agent panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg repeated every 2 weeks for a minimum of three cycles and continued until progression, a maximum of nine cycles or dose-limiting toxicity. The primary end point was the best overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) criteria. Secondary end points included evaluation of safety, toxicity and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Between May 2010 and May 2012, 16 patients were recruited. Fourteen patients were male and the median age was 68 years. Fifteen patients had locoregionally advanced or recurrent disease with 14 patients receiving previous radiotherapy and 7 receiving previous cytotoxic chemotherapy. The best ORR [partial (PR) or complete response (CR)] was 31% (3/16 PR, 2/16 CR) with a further 6 of 16 patients achieving SD. The median PFS and overall survival were 8 and 11 months respectively. Grade 3 or 4 events were observed in five patients (four being skin toxicity) with one patient ceasing due to skin toxicity. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 10 patients died due to progressive disease, 6 are alive, one patient with no evidence of disease at the time of analysis. Conclusions: Single-agent panitumumab is safe and effective in the management of patients with advanced CSCC even in a previously extensively pre-treated cohort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据