4.8 Article

Chemokine CXCL10 promotes atherogenesis by modulating the local balance of effector and regulatory T cells

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 113, 期 19, 页码 2301-2312

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.605121

关键词

atherosclerosis; immunology; inflammation; leukocytes; chemokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Studies to define the overall contribution of lymphocytes to lesion formation in atherosclerosis-susceptible mice have demonstrated relatively subtle effects; the use of lymphocyte-deficient mice, however, compromises both the effector and regulatory arms of the immune system. Here, we tested the hypothesis that deletion of CXCL10 (IP-10), a chemokine specific for effector T cells that has been localized within atherosclerotic lesions, would significantly inhibit atherogenesis. Methods and Results-Compound deficient Apoe(-/-)/Cxcl10(-/-) mice fed a Western-style diet for either 6 or 12 weeks demonstrated significant reductions in atherogenesis as compared with Apoe(-/-) controls, as assessed by both aortic en face and cross-sectional analyses. Immunohistochemical studies revealed a decrease in the accumulation of CD4(+) T cells, whereas quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of lesion-rich aortic arches demonstrated a marked reduction in mRNA for CXCR3, the CXCL10 chemokine receptor. Although overall T-cell accumulation was diminished significantly, we found evidence to suggest that regulatory T-cell (T-reg) numbers and activity were enhanced, as assessed by increased message for the T-reg-specific marker Foxp3, as well as increases in immunostaining for the T-reg-associated cytokines interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-beta 1. We also documented naturally occurring Treg cells in human atherosclerotic lesions. Conclusions-We provide novel evidence for a functional role for the effector T-cell chemoattractant CXCL10 in atherosclerotic lesion formation by modulating the local balance of the effector and regulatory arms of the immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据