4.7 Article

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist sitaxsentan

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 2049-2056

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.057

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the optimal dose of the selective endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist sitaxsentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); for observation only, an open-label (OL) bosentan arm was included. BACKGROUND Endothelin is a mediator of PAH. In a preliminary PAH study, the selective ETA receptor antagonist sitaxsentan improved six-min walk (6MW) distance, World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC), and hemodynamics. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled 18-week study, 247 PAH patients (idiopathic, or associated with connective tissue disease or congenital heart disease) were randomized; 245 patients were treated: placebo (n = 62), sitaxsentan 50 mg (n = 62) or 100 mg (n = 61), or OL (6MW tests, Borg dyspnea scores, and WHO FC assessments third-party blind) bosentan (n = 60). The primary end point was change in 6MW distance from baseline to week 18. Secondary end points included change in WHO FC, time to clinical worsening, and change in Borg dyspnea score. RESULTS At week 18, patients treated with sitaxsentan 100 mg had an increased 6MW distance compared with the placebo group (31.4 in, p = 0.03), and an improved WHO FC (p = 0.04). The placebo-subtracted treatment effect for sitaxsentan 50 mg was 24.2 in (p = 0.07) and for OL bosentan, 29.5 in (p = 0.05). The incidence of elevated hepatic transaminases (> 3 x the upper limit of normal) was 6% for placebo, 5% for sitaxsentan 50 mg, 3% for sitaxsentan 100 mg, and 11% for bosentan. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with the selective ETA receptor antagonist sitaxsentan, orally once daily at a dose of 100 mg, improves exercise capacity and WHO FC in PAH patients, with a low incidence of hepatic toxicity. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2049-56) (c) 2006 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据