4.6 Article

A1 subunit-mediated regulation of thrombin-activated factor VIII A2 subunit dissociation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 20, 页码 13922-13930

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M513124200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL40921] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Factor VIII (fVIII) is the plasma protein that is missing or deficient in hemophilia A. In contrast, elevated levels of fVIII are associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. fVIII is activated by thrombin to form a non-covalently linked A1/A2/A3-C1-C2 heterotrimer. At physiological concentrations, fVIIIa decays as a result of A2 subunit dissociation, which may help regulate the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis. A2 subunit dissociation is faster in human fVIIIa than in porcine fVIIIa, which may represent an evolutionary adaptation associated with the development of the upright posture and venous stasis in the lower extremities. To investigate the basis for the different decay kinetics of human and porcine fVIIIa, hybrid fVIII molecules representing all possible combinations of human and porcine A domains were isolated. The kinetics of fVIIIa decay were measured and fit to a model describing a reversible bimolecular reaction in which the dissociation rate constant, k, and dissociation constant, K-d, were the fitted parameters. Substitution of the porcine A1 domain into human fVIIIa produced a dissociation rate constant indistinguishable from porcine fVIIIa. Subsequently, substitution of the second cupredoxin-like A1 subdomain resulted in a dissociation rate constant similar to porcine fVIIIa, whereas substitution of the first cupredoxin-like A1 subdomain resulted in a dissociation rate constant intermediate between human and porcine fVIIIa. We propose that cupredoxin-like A1 subdomains in fVIII contain inter-species differences that are a result of selective pressure on the dissociation rate constant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据