4.7 Article

A comparative study of the action of tolperisone on seven different voltage dependent sodium channel isoforms

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 538, 期 1-3, 页码 5-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.03.034

关键词

voltage dependent sodium channel; tolperisone; lidocame; Xenopus laevis oocyte; local anesthetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specific, acute interaction of tolperisone, an agent used as a muscle relaxant and for the treatment of chronic pain conditions, with the Na-v1.2, Na-v1.3, Na-v1.4, Na-v1.5, Na-v1.6, Na-v1.7, and Na-v1.8 isoforms of voltage dependent sodium channels was investigated and compared to that of lidocaine. Voltage dependent sodium channels were expressed in the Xenopus laevis oocyte expression system and sodium currents were recorded with the two electrode voltage clamp technique. Cumulative dose response relations revealed marked differences in IC50 values between the two drugs on identical isoforms, as well as between isoforms. A detailed kinetic analysis uncovered that tolperisone as well as lidocaine exhibited their blocking action not only via state dependent association/dissociation with voltage dependent sodium channels, but a considerable fraction of inhibition is tonic, i.e. permanent and basic in nature. Voltage dependent activation was affected to a minor extent only. A shift in steady-state inactivation to more negative potentials could be observed for most drug/isoform combinations. The contribution of this shift to overall block was, however, small at drug concentrations resulting in considerable overall block. Recovery from inactivation was affected notably by both drugs. Lidocaine application led to a pronounced prolongation of the time constant of the fast recovery process for the Na-v1.3, Na-v1.5, and Na-v1.7 isoforms, indicating common structural properties in the local anesthetic receptor site of these three proteins. Interestingly, this characteristic drug action was not observed for tolperisone. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据