4.6 Article

Electrophoretic deposition of titanate nanotubes from commercial titania nanoparticles: Application to dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 961-966

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.03.037

关键词

titanate nanotubes; FTO glass; electrophoretic deposition; dye-sensitized solar cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The titanate nanotubes were synthesized by hydrothermal process using commercial titania nanoparticles. Subsequently, the titanate nanotubes film was fabricated at room temperature on FTO (F-SnO2 coated glass) substrates using electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method at 40 V. The titanate nanotubes and the films were characterized with field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The average lengths of these nanotubes are few hundreds of manometers and diameters similar to 10-20 nm, with reasonably dense and uniform film. It was found that during EPD, the intercalated sodium (Na) from the titanate nanotubes was removed, as confirmed by XRD and EDX studies. Finally, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) were prepared, after annealing the film from 450 C to 550 C, on using the two types of the films fabricated by electrophoretic deposition and doctor-blade method. It was observed that the open circuit voltage (V-oc) in all the cases was similar to 0.8 V, with incident radiation intensity adjusted to AM-1.5. The solar cell corresponding to electrodeposited titanate nanotubes annealed at 500 degrees C showed a photocurrent density (I-sc) of similar to 15.67 mA/cm(2) (eta = 6.71%). The solar cell fabricated with doctor-blade method using titanate nanotubes, annealed at 450 degrees C shows much lower photocurrent density similar to 1.31 mA/cm(2) (eta = 0.65%), due to non-conversion of titanate nanotubes to titania, intercalated sodium and poor interfacial adhesion between titanate nanotubes and FTO substrate. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据