4.6 Article

Sedimentary facies and the context of dolocrete in the Lower Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group: Corrib field west of Ireland

期刊

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
卷 187, 期 3-4, 页码 205-227

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.12.028

关键词

Corrib; Triassic; basin; dolocrete; palaeoclimate change

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Lower Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group (SSG) reservoir in the Corrib Field is predominantly fine- to medium-grained fluvial sandstone with minor aeolian and playa sediments that formed under semi-arid to and conditions. There is no evidence of roots, burrows or organic-rich soils in the SSG suggesting an environment with sparse vegetation in the catchment and sedimentation from a predominantly braided sand-dominated river. Dolomite is the main porosity-occluding cement (< 25 vol.%) in the Sherwood Sandstone Group reservoir in the Corrib Gas Field, offshore west of Ireland. Dolomite is demonstrably early diagenetic since it is non-ferroan, brightly luminescent, occurs in rocks with high (uncompacted) intergranular volumes and grew before all burial diagenetic cements. Conversely, calcrete is the dominant early diagenetic cement in well 27/5-1 in the SSG, similar to 50 km south of Corrib. Dolocrete and/or calcrete are represented throughout the entire SSG interval and typically form under conditions of very low sediment accumulation rates. Dolocrete occurs equally in all facies showing that it is not a result of depositional processes. Core goniometry data in the Corrib Field revealed that the general palaeoflow direction was from south to north. During progressive evaporation of river- and ground-water calcite formed first, followed by dolomite further downstream with gypsum formed last if evaporation continues. This well-established pattern indicates that well 27/5-1 has calcrete and Corrib has dolocrete since they both result from evaporative concentration of ground- and river-water during flow down the very shallow Triassic palaeogradient. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据