4.5 Article

Dietary and genetic determinants of homocysteine levels among Mexican women of reproductive age

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 60, 期 6, 页码 691-697

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602370

关键词

Mexico; homocysteine; MTHFR polymorphisms; B-12 vitamin intake

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43TW00640] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the independent and joint effects of dietary folate, vitamin B-12 consumption and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase ( MTHFR) polymorphisms ( 677C > T and 1298A > C) on the circulating folate and homocysteine ( Hcy) levels among Mexican women of reproductive age. Design: A cross-sectional, population-based study. Subjects: The first 130 healthy non-pregnant women ( aged 16 - 34 years) who agreed to participate in a reproductive cohort in Morelos, Mexico. Main outcome measurements: Dietary intakes of vitamin B-12 and folate were estimated using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. MTHFR 677C > T and 1298A > C polymorphisms were ascertained using the PCR-based method. Serum levels of Hcy and folate were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Results: Genotype frequencies for the MTHFR 677C > T polymorphism were 21.5% ( CC), 52.3% ( CT) and 26.2% ( TT) among Mexican women. Of the population, 22% had the MTHFR 1298AC genotype, while no individual carried the 1298CC genotype. We observed an increased level of Hcy among carriers of the 677TT genotype, compared to carriers of the 677CC genotype. The highest level of Hcy was observed among MTHFR 677TT carriers with low B-12 intake ( < 2.0 mu g/day), which resulted with a significant interaction ( P = 0.01). Conclusion: Vitamin B-12 is an important determinant of Hcy levels in Mexico. Supplementation of folic acid with vitamin B-12 may be preferable when the MTHFR 677T variant allele is prevalent. Sponsorship: Fogarty International Center of NIH, CONACyT Mexico

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据