4.2 Article

The anti-lymphoma effect of antibody-mediated immunotherapy is based on an increased degranulation of peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 753-759

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.02.015

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In patients treated with rituximab and alemtuzumab for lymphomas or CLL, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) is a major mechanism of action. Therefore, assessment of ADCC is mandatory to understand the complex mechanisms leading to the anti-lymphoma effects of monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Due to methodical difficulties, little is yet known about the relevant cell subpopulations and effector mechanisms leading to tumor lysis in ADCC. Methods. We used a novel flow cytometric assay that detects CD107a as a marker for NK-cell degranulation to characterize and quantify peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells mediating ADCC in vitro and in vivo. Results. We observed specific and dose-dependent NK-cell activation after administration of rituximab and alemtuzumab. The number of degranulating NK cells was closely related to the concentration of mAb and the effector:target ratio. We were able to quantify and characterize the peripheral blood NK cells mediating ADCC. The majority of degranulating NK cells had the phenotype: CD56(dim), CD69(+), NKG2D(+), NKp30(+), NKp46(-), and CD94(-). Furthermore, we found that the CD107a assay can also visualize ADCC under clinical conditions as we observed increased numbers of NK cells degranulating in response to CD20(+) lymphoma cell lines in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab. Conclusions. We were able to quantify and characterize NK cells mediating ADCC with a new and feasible method. The CD107a assay may be useful for predicting treatment responses of individual patients and may help find the optimal dosage and timing for treatment with mAb. (c) 2006 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据