4.6 Article

Study of acetone photodissociation over the wavelength range 248-330 nm: Evidence of a mechanism involving both the singlet and triplet excited states

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 110, 期 21, 页码 6742-6756

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp056276g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/T/S/2002/00039] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of the acetyl yield from acetone photolysis have been made using laser flash photolysis/ laser induced fluorescence. Phi(total)(lambda, p, T) was determined over the ranges: 266 <= lambda/nm <= 327.5, 0.3 <= p/Torr <= 400 and 218 <= T/K <= 295. The acetyl yield was determined relative to that at 248 nm by conversion to OH by reaction with O-2. Linear Stern- Volmer plots (1/[OH] vs [M]) describe the data for lambda < 300 nm, but for lambda > 300 nm, nonlinear Stern- Volmer plots were observed. This behavior is interpreted as evidence for dissociation from two excited states of acetone: S-1 when the Stern- Volmer plots are linear and both S1 and T-1 when Stern- Volmer plots are nonlinear. A model for acetone photolysis is proposed that can adequately describe both the present and literature data. Barriers to dissociation are invoked in order to explain the dependence of pressure quenching of the acetone photolysis yields as a function of wavelength and temperature. This pressure quenching was observed to become more efficient with increasing wavelength, but it was only above similar to 300 nm that a significant T dependence was observed, which became more pronounced at longer wavelengths. This is the first study to observe a T-dependent Phi(total)(lambda, p, T). A parametrized expression for Phi(total)(lambda, p, T) has been developed and is compared against the recommended literature data by running box model simulations of the atmosphere. These simulations show that acetone photolysis occurs more slowly at the top of the troposphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据