4.5 Article

ICAM-1 is overexpressed by villous trophoblasts in placentitis

期刊

PLACENTA
卷 27, 期 6-7, 页码 750-757

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2005.07.008

关键词

placenta; chronic villitis; intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although an in vitro study has hypothesized that expression of ICAM-1 by villous trophoblasts could be important for the influx of maternal immune cells in villitis, it remains to be shown whether the same phenomenon occurs in human villitis. To investigate the expression of ICAM-1 by villous trophoblasts, its relationship with rupture of the trophoblastic barrier and influx of immune cells into the villi, we analysed 18 paraffin-embedded placentas with placentitis (5 by Toxoplasma gondii, 3 by Trypanosoma cruzi, 2 by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and 8 of unknown aetiology - VUE) and 8 control placentas for detection of ICAM-1 by Immunohistochemistry. All cases but one of placentitis showed trophoblast overexpression of ICAM-1 in the inflamed villi, located almost exclusively next to the areas of trophoblastic rupture. The villitis cases (caused by T cruzi, T gondii and VUE) presented leukocyte adherence in the areas of trophoblastic rupture. When the inflammatory reaction was situated in the intervillous space (placentitis by P brasiliensis), in spite of the trophoblastic rupture and ICAM-1 overexpression there was no leukocyte influx into villi. None of the control placentas showed ICAM-I expression by the trophoblast. We concluded that overexpression. of ICAM-1 by villous trophoblasts occurs during placentitis characterized by accumulation of leukocytes in the villous or intervillous space and probably plays an important role in the rupture of the trophoblastic barrier. The influx of immune cells into the villi appears to be mediated by ICAM-1 but the location of the antigen within villous stroma is certainly a crucial factor for its occurrence. Placenta (2006), 27, 750-757 (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据