4.0 Article

Potential forest cover of New Zealand as determined by an ecosystem process model

期刊

NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 211-232

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0028825X.2006.9513019

关键词

biome; forest ecosystem model; Nothofagus; Agathis; direct extrapolation; New Zealand; biogeography; biogeochemical modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A forest biome map for New Zealand is presented, based on the ecosystem process model LINKNZ. Climate surfaces, landforms, slope, and soil types defined 88933 homogeneous landscape units covering the North and South islands (264000 km(2)). Forest development (2000 years) was simulated on each unit with 78 individually parameterised species selected by ecological importance. Forest biomes for the units were assigned by the relative biomass predicted for 21 plant functional types, categorised from the available species. An assessment of model performance against a systematic sample of 559 measured forest plots was satisfactory (dissimilarity index = 0.25). Direct validation was not possible over most of the landscape where native forest has been removed, but performance was sensible against data from 136 pre-deforestation pollen sites (dissimilarity index = 0.20). The modelled biome map reproduced the main characteristics of the current forest distribution in New Zealand and departures from the observed forest distribution were generally explained by omission of whole-stand disturbance effects from simulations. The model reproduced lowland areas of the striking beech gap in the west-central zone of the Southern Alps, but not the distribution of Nothofagus species in montane areas of this zone. The most likely explanation supported previous conclusions that the 'absence was due to a slow reinvasion of Nothofagus after exclusion during the Last Glaciation. Predictions of Nothofagus across some regions of the south-eastern South Island where it was nearly absent before settlement suggested that the ecological knowledge of some competing conifer species was incomplete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据