4.7 Article

Lipidomics: An analysis of cellular lipids by ESI-MS

期刊

METHODS
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 92-103

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.05.014

关键词

glycerophospholipids; lipidomics; electrospray ionization; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM58516, U54GM69338] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recognition of the importance of lipid signaling in cellular function has led to rapid progress in the technology of lipid analysis. Measurements of lipid species changes are central to defining the networks of cell signaling (e.g., receptor activation by hormones or drugs) and lipids are involved in many biochemical and pathological processes. During the last several years our laboratory has focused on developing efficient methods for extraction of glycerophospholipids from biological systems and their detection and identification by mass spectrometry. We analyze phospholipid changes in mammalian cells as a result of a defined ligand stimulation strategy that supports the research questions of the consortium. The improvement of mass spectrometry techniques for phospholipid analysis combined with sophisticated computational methods developed in our group has facilitated simultaneous analysis of hundreds of phospholipid species in mammalian cells. This information is presented as Lipid Arrays (or more precisely as virtual arrays) and allows identification of temporal changes in membrane phospholipid species between two contrasting biological conditions (e.g., unstimulated basal vs. stimulated or as a contrast between normal and disease stages). Using the lipidomics approach, we are able to identify approximately 450 phospholipid species from total membrane extracts and qualitatively measure pattern response changes initiated by cell surface receptors. As such, this approach facilitates the elucidation of the metabolic changes induced by a perturbation in the cell and recognition of patterns of signaling. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据