4.6 Article

Analysis of firnbrial gene clusters and their expression in enterohaernorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 1033-1047

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00995.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [D19613] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [D19613] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sequence of two enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 strains reveals the possession of at least 16 fimbrial gene clusters, many of the chaperone/usher class. The first part of this study examined the distribution of these clusters in a selection of EHEC/EPEC (enteropathogenic E. coli) serotypes to determine if any were likely to be unique to E. coli O157:H7. Six of the clusters, as determined by the presence of amplified main subunit or usher gene sequences, were detected only in the E. coli O157 and 0145 serotypes tested. With the exception of one serotype 0103 strain that contained an Ipf2 cluster, Ipf sequences were only detected in E. coli O157 of the serotypes tested. Expression from each cluster was measured by the construction of chromosomally integrated IacZ promoter fusions and plasmid-based eGFP fusions in E. coli O157:H7. This analysis demonstrated that the majority (11/15) of main fimbrial subunit genes were not expressed under the majority of conditions tested in vitro. One of the clusters showing promoter activity, loc8, has a temperature expression optimum indicating a possible role outside the host. From the presence of pseudogenes in three of the clusters, the lack of FimH-like minor adhesins in the clusters and their limited expression in vitro, it would appear that E coli O157:H7 has a limited repertoire of expressed functional fimbriae. This restricted selection of fimbriae may be important-in bringing about the tropism E coli O157:H7 demonstrates for the terminal rectum of cattle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据