4.5 Article

Arabidopsis displays centromeric DNA hypomethylation and cytological alterations of heterochromatin upon attack by Pseudomonas syringae

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 577-587

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0577

关键词

biotic stress; DNA methylation changes; interphase nuclei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant tissues display major alterations upon the perception of microbial pathogens. Changes of cytoplasmic and apo-plastic components that sense and transduce plant defenses have been extensively characterized. In contrast, less information is available about modifications affecting the plant nuclear genome under these circumstances. Here, we investigated whether the Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation status is altered in tissues responding to the attack of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. We applied amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis to monitor cytosine methylation at anonymous 5'-CCGG-3' and 5'-GATC-3' sites in naive and infected samples. Plant genomic fragments reducing methylation upon infection, including peri/centromeric repeats such as the 180-bp unit, Athila retrotansposon, and a portion of the nuclear insertion of mitochondrial DNA, were isolated and characterized. R syringae pv. tomato-induced hypomethylation was detected by high-performance liquid chromatography assays and at the molecular level it did not seem to equally affect all 5-methyl cytosine (5-mC) residues. Nuclei from challenged tissues displayed structural chromatin alterations, including loosening of chromocenters, which also were stimulated by avirulent P syringae pv. tomato, but not by the P syringae pv. tomato hrpL(-) mutant. Finally, P syringae pv. tomato-induced hypomethylation was found to occur in the absence of DNA replication, suggesting that it involves an active demethyllation mechanism. All these responses occurred at 1 day postinfection, largely preceding massive plant cell death generated by pathogen attack.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据