4.7 Article

In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of the novel derivatized polyvinyl alcohol-based polymer P10(4)

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 3485-3493

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2318

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The major limitation to successful chemotherapy of neuroblastoma is the toxicity of traditional antitumor drugs. Hence, less toxic and more effective drugs are to be found, and novel formulations of conventional compounds allowing a more favorable biodistribution should be sought for. In an attempt to pursue this task, we recently synthesized an amphiphilic polymer based on a polyvinyl alcohol backbone [P10(4)]. Experimental Design: The cytotoxic activity of P10(4) was evaluated both in vitro on neuroblastoma and melanoma cell lines and in vivo in pseudometastatic neuroblastoma models. Apoptosis was assessed by morphology, cytofluorimetric analysis of DNA content, and DNA fragmentation assay. Caspases activation was investigated by kits specific for caspase-1, caspase-2, caspase-3, caspase-4, caspase-6, caspase-7, caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-10, and caspase-13. Colony formation was evaluated by soft agar assay. Results: P10(4) exerted a potent cytotoxic activity on different neuroblastoma and melanoma cell lines through induction of both extrinsic and intrinsic caspase cascades and subsequent apoptosis. Moreover, the clonogenic potential of cells that survived P10(4) treatment was strongly reduced. Next, we tested the effects of P10(4) in nude mice injected with both a human and a murine neuroblastoma cell lines i.v. P10(4) significantly increased the life span and the long-term survival of treated mice over controls. No side effects were observed, even at doses higher than those used for therapeutic purposes. Conclusions: Our data suggest that P10(4) holds promise as an anticancer compound and, because of its lack of interaction with DNA, is unlikely to give rise to drug resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据