4.8 Article

Compound class specific 14C analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with PM10 and PM1.1 aerosols from residential areas of suburban Tokyo

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 11, 页码 3474-3480

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es052407f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compound class specific radiocarbon analysis (CCSRA) was performed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) associated with airborne particulate matter (APM) with diameter < 10 mu m (PM10) and < 1.1 mu m (PM1.1) collected from a residential area of suburban Tokyo, Japan, and seasonal and particle-size radiocarbon variations were investigated. Source diagnostic isomer pair ratios indicated mixed contributions from petroleum combustion and from biomass and coal combustion to the PAHs in APM. The Delta C-14-PAHs in APM, ranging from-787 to-514%, indicated dominance of fossil fuel combustion. The Delta C-14 of 5-6 rings (HMW) PAHs were higher than the 3-4 rings (LMW) species in both PM10 and PM1.1 samples. The Delta C-14 of HMW-PAHs indicated greater biomass-burning contributions in summer than in winter and no apparent particle-size variation. Conversely, the Delta C-14 of LMW species showed a greater contribution from fossil sources in summer and in larger particles ( PM10). This finding could be tentatively attributed to the recondensation of fossil-PAHs vaporized from petroleum sources. A C-14 isotopic mass balance approach estimated that biomass burning contributes 17-45% of the PAH burden in suburban Tokyo, and that the increase in the biomass-PAH accounts for approximately 27% and 22% of winter-time elevation of LMW-and HMW-PAHs, respectively. These are far exceeding what is expected from the emission statistics for CO2 and combusted materials in Japan and emphasizing the importance of biomass-burning as a source of PAHs; which, in turn, demonstrates the utility and the significance of field-based source assessment by using CCSRA for an effective regulation of atmospheric pollution by PAHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据