4.4 Article

Effect of short-term Rosuvastatin treatment on estimated glomerular filtration rate

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 1602-1606

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.052

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To define the effect of short-term rosuvastatin treatment on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the database of controlled clinical trials in the Rosuvastatin Clinical Development Program was reviewed. Thirteen studies comprising 3,956 rosuvastatin-treated patients were selected based on a serum creatinine measurement at 6 or 8 weeks after initiation of rosuvastatin treatment, randomization to approved and marketed rosuvastatin doses (5 to 40 mg), and unchanged rosuvastatin dose from treatment initiation (baseline) through 6 to 8 weeks of treatment. eGFR was determined with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. eGFR significantly increased for each dose of rosuvastatin individually and for all doses combined compared with baseline (range +0.9 to +3.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Further analysis-of 5 blinded, placebo-controlled trials comprising 525 patients showed an increase in eGFR of +0.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval +0.1 to +1.5) for all rosuvastatin-treated patients, which was significantly different from baseline (p < 0.04) and from a change of -1.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the placebo-treated patients (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.5, p < 0.001). The increase in eGFR for rosuvastatin-treated patients was consistent across all major demographic and clinical subgroups of interest, including patients with baseline proteitiuria, baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. In conclusion, these results are consistent with previous rosuvastatin studies that showed an upward trend in eGFR. with long-term treatment ( 96 weeks) and with the hypothesis that statins may have pleiotropic mechanisms of action that include beneficial renal effects. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据