4.1 Article

Treatment with venlafaxine extended release after SSRI nonresponse or intolerance - A randomized comparison of standard- and higher-dosing strategies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 250-258

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000219922.19305.08

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Evaluate efficacy of standard and higher doses of venlafaxine extended release (ER) in depressed outpatients who had either not responded to or could not tolerate an adquate trial of therapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Methods: Outpatients (n = 232) with major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with either standard (n = 119; mean dose 148 mg/d) or higher (n = 113; mean dose = 309 mg/d) dosage therapies. Between weeks 8 and 12, nonresponders in the standard dose group could receive higher dose therapy. Results: Response rates in the higher dose group were significantly greater at week 8 on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (68% vs 52%; P < 0.001) and Patient Global Impressions scale (intent-to-treat; 68% vs. 50%; P < 0.001). The dosing strategies did not, however, differ significantly in change in HAM-D-21 total score or HANI-D-21 response or remission rates. At week 12, there were no significant efficacy differences between the two groups in the intent-to-treat sample. Five side effects (constipation, sweating, hypertension, agitation, and urinary frequency) were more common in the high-dose group. Conclusions: Higher dose therapy with venlafaxine ER (ie, 300375 mg/d) resulted in a more rapid response on some measures, but was not as well tolerated as therapy at standard doses. Although these data provide further evidence of a dose-response relationship for venlafaxine therapy results suggest that slower titration to higher doses of ventafaxine ER may improve tolerability without greatly diminishing the probability of success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据