4.0 Article

Amygdalar volume and behavioral development in autism

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 686-693

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.686

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The amygdala is associated with socioemotional function and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of autism. Objective: To examine the relationship between amygdalar volume at ages 3 and 4 years and severity of clinical course and outcome at 6 years of age in children with autism spectrum disorder. Design: Magnetic resonance images acquired at 3 and 4 years of age were used to measure total cerebral, amygdalar, and hippocampal volumes. Acquisition of social and communication skills was assessed semiannually using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Hierarchical linear models were used to predict variability in individual linear growth trajectories as a function of IQ, total cerebral, and amygdalar or hippocampal volumes. Setting: Longitudinal study of children with autism spectrum disorder. Participants: Forty-five children with autism spectrum disorders between 3 and 6 years of age. Main Outcome Measure: Linear growth trajectory of age equivalence Vineland communication and social scores. Results: Larger right amygdalar volume was associated with more severe social and communication impairments at ages 3 and 4 years. Larger right amygdalar volume also was predictive of poorer social and communication abilities at age 6 years, even after controlling for IQ and total cerebral volume. Parallel analyses with hippocampal volumes found no relationship to social or communication development. Conclusions: Larger right amygdalar volume at 3 and 4 years of age, but not left amygdalar, hippocampal, or total cerebral volume, is associated with a more severe clinical course and worse outcome at age 6 years in children with autism spectrum disorder. These results provide additional evidence that amygdalar development is implicated in the behavioral impairments found in autism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据