4.4 Article

A pyrazolyl-thiazole derivative causes antinociception in mice

期刊

出版社

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2006000600013

关键词

antinociception; pyrazolyl-thiazole derivatives; writhing test; opioid mechanism; naloxone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigates the antinociceptive effect of the pyrazolyl-thiazole derivative 2-(5-trichloromethyl-5-hydroxy-3-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-4-(4-bromophenyl)-5-methylthiazole (B50) in mice. Male albino Swiss mice (30-40 g) were used in the acetic acid-induced abdominal writhes and tail-immersion tests. B50 caused dose-dependent antinociception (8, 23 and 80 mu mol/kg, sc) in the acetic acid writhing assay (number of writhes: vehicle: 27.69 +/- 6.15; B50 (8 mu mol/kg): 16.92 +/- 3.84; B50 (23 mu mol/kg): 13.85 +/- 3.84; B50 (80 mu mol/kg): 9.54 +/- 3.08; data are reported as means SEM for 9 animals per group). On the other hand, B50 did not cause antinociception in the tail immersion assay. Naloxone (2.75 mu mol/kg, sc) prevented B50-induced antinociception (number of writhes: vehicle-saline: 31.11 +/- 3.15; vehicle-naloxone: 27.41 +/- 3.70; B50 (80 mu mol/kg)-saline: 8.70 +/- 3.33; B50 (80 mu mol/kg)-naloxone: 31.84 +/- 4.26; morphine-saline: 2.04 +/- 3.52; morphine-naloxone: 21.11 +/- 4.26; 8-9 animals per group). The removal of the methyl group of the thiazole ring of B50 or substitution of the bromo substituent with the methyl at position 4 of the phenyl group, which is attached to the thiazole ring of B50, resulted in loss of activity, suggesting that these substituents are important for antinociceptive activity. B50 had no effect on spontaneous locomotion or rotarod performance, indicating that the antinociceptive effect of B50 is not related to nonspecific motor effects. The antinociceptive profile of B50 seems to be closer to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs than to classic opioid agents, since it had no analgesic effect in a thermally motivated test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据