4.7 Article

Docetaxel is effective in heavily pretreated patients with disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 718-722

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq425

关键词

docetaxel; metastatic; nasopharyngeal cancer

类别

资金

  1. Sanofi Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere) as therapy in patients with disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients and methods: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent NPC who have failed at least one line of palliative chemotherapy regimen but no prior docetaxel were eligible. Patients received weekly docetaxel every 28 days (docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15) and were evaluated every two cycles of treatment of response assessment. Quality-of-life (QoL) assessments during the treatment period were done using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire QLQ-C30; version 3.0. Results: Thirty patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The median age of the patients was 47 years (range 25-68 years) and the majority of patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included fatigue (13%), anemia (10%) and diarrhea (3%) of patients. Eleven (37%) and four (13.3%) patients achieved partial response and stable disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival of 12.8 months. The partial responders had a mean duration of response of 4.1 months. Docetaxel caused a significant decline in QoL scores during treatment of patients responding or progressing with the treatment. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and is an active agent in patients with disseminated NPC who were previously exposed and largely refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy but can cause a significant decline in QoL during treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据