4.6 Article

Differential HHV-6A gene expression in T cells and primary human astrocytes based on multi-virus array analysis

期刊

GLIA
卷 53, 期 8, 页码 789-798

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20333

关键词

HHV-6; multiple sclerosis; astrocytes; multi-virus array; viral persistency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a ubiquitous virus that has been associated with a wide spectrum of diseases, such as exanthem infantum, multiple sclerosis, seizures, encephalitis/meningitis, and more recently, mesial temporal lobe sclerosis. Although HHV-6 is known to predominately infect CD4+ T lymphocytes, its ability to infect neural glial cells has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. Reactivation of latent HHV-6 infection in the brain has recently been suggested to play a role in the development of neuropathogenesis. To investigate the association of viral gene expression and disease pathogenesis, we developed a multivirus array containing all open reading frames of the HHV-6 virus and other pathogenically related viruses (EBV, HBV, HHV-8, HIV-1, HTLV-1, HTLV-2) to study expression of viral gene transcripts. In this study, we infected CD4+ T lymphocytes and primary human astrocytes derived from brain biopsy material in vitro with the more neurotropic HHV-6A strain. Hierarchal cluster analysis based on gene expression over time suggested a temporally regulated herpesvirus transcription process. Furthermore, we compared viral gene expression in CD4+ T lymphocytes and primary human astrocytes at peak viral load levels (> 10(8) copies of virus/10(6) cells) at 5 days post-infection. Differential expression of HHV-6A genes was observed between CD4+ T lymphocytes and primary human astrocytes. Absence of a number of HHV-6 genes detected at 5 days post-infection in primary human astrocytes suggests an alternative replication strategy used by HHV-6 to evade immune detection and allow establishment of persistent infection in neural glial cells. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据