期刊
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 414-423出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.002
关键词
multi-criteria analysis; analytic hierarchy process; stated preference; urban transport investments; decision making; transport environmental impacts
This work compares the outcome of Cost Benefit Analysis and a Multi-Criteria method when applied to a transport project. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used, utilising two approaches to derive the weights. Results show that the outcome of the Multi-Criteria method did not match the one suggested by the Cost Benefit Analysis, but it did match the final decision by the authority. An important conclusion has to do with the relevance of incorporating other aspects into the assessment, apart from the economic ones. Furthermore, public opinion should be taken into account explicitly into the decision making, providing accurate and timely information about projects. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据