4.6 Article

BRCA1 promoter methylation predicts adverse ovarian cancer prognosis

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 403-410

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.10.034

关键词

DNA methylation; ovarian cancer; survival

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA083636, R21 CA89137, 5P50 CA83636] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To compare the clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients whose tumors contain BRCA1 genes silenced by promoter hypermethylation to patients with germline BRCA1 mutations and to patients with wild-type BRCA genes. Methods. Ovarian cancers from a hospital-based honor bank were characterized as having a BRCA1 mutation; or a methylated BRCA1, BRCA1 pseudogene or MLH1 promotor; or a wild-type BRCA gene. Survival of patients with methylated BRCA1 promoters (N = 11) was compared to that of patients with wild-type BRCA genes (N = 30) and BRCA1 mutations (N = 22). A methylator phenotype was defined to include tumors with hypermethylation of BRCA1, hMLH1 and/or dBRCA1 pseudogene promoters (N = 23). Results. All cohorts had comparable clinical factors except for age at diagnosis. Median age of methylated BRCA1 and wild-type BRCA patients was older than BRCA1 mutation carriers (60 and 63 versus 48 years; P = 0.04). The median disease-free interval was significantly shorter for patients with a methylated BRCA1 promoter (9.8 months) than for BRCA1 mutation carriers (39.5 months; P = 0.04). Median overall survival was also significantly shorter for patients with a methylated BRCA1 promoter (35.6 months) than BRCA1 mutation carriers (78.6 months: P = 0.02). The combined methylator phenotype cohort had significantly shorter survival (36.1 months) compared to wild-type BRCA patients (63.3 months: P = 0.02). Conclusion. These data suggest that methylation of the BRCA1 promoter is associated with poor patient outcome. BRCA1 may be part of a global panel of methylated genes associated with aggressive disease. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据