4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Brominated flame retardant concentrations and trends in abiotic media

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 181-186

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.12.006

关键词

brominated flame retardant; air; sewage sludge; polybrominated diphenyl ether; hexabromocyclododecane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BFR burdens in abiotic media have been less studied than in biota. despite their essential value as an aide to identifying sources. temporal and geographic trends and exposure routes. Many polymer products consist of several percent by weight of BFRs. Global trade in these can result in rapid and wholesale BFR movement. Loss from ill-Use products of nonreactive BFRs may be important. particularly in respect to indoor exposure. In the case of BDE-209, discharges from publicly owned treatment Works may be substantial. BFR burdens in air, water and sewage sludge respond rapidly to changes in environmental BFR inputs. PBDEs have been the most widely studied. In many locales PBDE burdens in these media now surpass those of PCBs. Air and water near sources and urban areas are typically enriched relative to rural locales. The more volatile PBDEs dominate in the vapor phase, while BDE-209 typically predominates on particulates. Evidence exists for long-range transport of the more volatile PBDEs. A greater diversity of BFRs (mostly PBDEs, HBCD and TBBP-A) has been detected in sewage sludges. Land application Of these sludges oil agricultural fields is one conduit for soil contamination. In general, environmental concentrations of BDE-209 appear to be increasing. while perita-BDE burdens in Europe may have peaked. Sediments function as longer-term integrators of environmental burdens. Concentrations of common BFRs therein may be substantial near point sources. Evidence for debromination in the environment has been limited to date. However. some laboratory and field observations suggest it is possible to a limited extent. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据