4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Diffusion of He interstitials in grain boundaries in α-Fe

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 351, 期 1-3, 页码 133-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.015

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helium diffusion in metals is a complex process due to its very low solubility in solids and its ability to be trapped by vacancy type defects or impurities. The preferential positions and predominant migration mechanisms of He atoms depend on temperature, as well as the presence of other intrinsic or irradiation induced defects that can act as traps for He. This work presents results of a systematic molecular dynamics study of the diffusion mechanisms of He atoms in grain boundaries in alpha-Fe. Two grain boundaries, Sigma 11 < 110 > {323} and Sigma 3 < 110 > {112}, were used for the current investigations. The low-temperature (about 0 K) equilibrium structures of these grain boundaries were determined using standard molecular dynamics relaxation techniques, with a flexible border condition. The migration of He atoms were followed for 1-14 ns, at temperatures between 600 and 1200 K. The diffusion coefficient of He atoms using the mean square displacements of He atoms, and the effective migration energies were determined. We found that He atoms diffuse rapidly in the Sigma 11 grain boundary, where the binding energy of a He atom to the boundary is high. He migration is primarily one-dimensional along specific directions, but a few directional changes were observed at higher temperatures. In the D grain boundary, where the He binding energy is low, He atoms migrate one-dimensionally at low temperature, two-dimensionally at intermediate temperature and three-dimensionally at higher temperature. The different activation energies and diffusion mechanisms in these two representative grain boundaries suggests that the atomic structures of the grain boundaries play an important role in the difftusivity of He. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据