4.6 Article

Inhibitory effects of cis- and trans-resveratrol on noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake and on monoamine oxidase activity

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.190

关键词

cis-resveratrol; trans-resveratrol; noradrenaline and 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake; human recombinant MAO isoforms; human platelets; rat brain synaptosomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated for the first time the potential effects of cis- and trans-resveratrol (c-RESV and t-RESV) oil noradrenaline (NA) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake by synaptosomes from rat brain, on 5-HT uptake by human platelets, and on monoanline oxidase (MAO) isoform activity. Both c-RESV and t-RESV (5-200 mu M) concentration-dependently inhibited the uptake of [H-3]NA and [H-3]5-HT by synaptosomes from rat brain and the uptake of [H-3]5-HT by human platelets. In both experimental models, t-RESV was slightly more efficient than c-RESV. Furthermore, in synaptosomes from rat brain, the RESV isomers were less selective against [H-3]5-HT uptake than the reference drug fiuoxetine (0.1-30 mu M). On the other hand, both c-RESV and t-RESV (5-200 mu M) concentration-dependently inhibited the enzymatic activity of commercial (human recombinant) MAO isoform (MAO-A and MAO-B) activity, c-RESV being slightly less effective than t-RESV. In addition, both RESV isomers were slight but significantly more selective against MAO-A than against MAO-B. Since the principal groups of drugs used in the treatment of depressive disorders are NA/5-HT uptake or MAO inhibitors, under the assumption that the RESV isomers exhibit a similar behaviour in humans in vivo, our results suggest that these natural polyphenols may be of value as structural templates for the design and development of new antidepressant drugs with two important biochemical activities combined in the same chemical structure: NA/5-HT uptake and MAO inhibitory activity. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据