4.8 Article

Contribution of IL-18 to atopic-dermatitis-like skin inflammation induced by Staphylocloccus aureus product in mice

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602900103

关键词

IL-3; protein A; IFN-gamma; super Th1 cells; intrinsic atopic dermatitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease of unknown etiology. Cutaneous infection with microbes such as Staphylococcus aureus and/or skin cleansing with detergent exacerbates clinical AD. Here, we generated an AD animal model by destroying skin barrier function with detergent and subsequent topical application of protein A from S. aureus (SpA). NC/Nga mice, which genetically have reduced skin barrier function, and BALB/c mice having intact skin barrier function, were susceptible to this combination and developed severe and moderate AD, respectively, associated with dermal accumulation of eosinophils and mast cells. Both types of mice showed an increase in serum levels of IL-18, but not IgE. The epidermis of the NC/Nga mice rapidly expressed T helper type 1 (Th1)-associated chemokines, including ligands for CXCR3 and CCR5, after application of both SpA and detergent, but not after application of detergent alone. Although treatment with detergent induced moderate Th1 cell response, additional SpA treatment was a prerequisite for induction of the differentiation of naive T cells toward unique Th1 cells, termed '' super Th1 cells,'' capable of producing both Th1 (IFN-gamma) and T helper type 2 cytokine (IL-13), as well as IL-3, and expressing CXCR3 and CCR5. Induction of super Th1 cells required IL-18 stimulation. Blockade of IL-18 prevented AD development, whereas blockade of IL-3 partially prevented AD development, suggesting a contribution of IL-18-dependent IL-3 production to AD with cutaneous mastocytosis. il18(-/-)BALB/c mice similarly evaded SDS/SpA-induced AD. Thus, IL-18 might be important for the development of infection-associated AD by induction of IL-3 from super Th1 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据