4.7 Article

Synergic antitumoral effect of an IGF-IR inhibitor and trastuzumab on HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1860-1869

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn406

关键词

breast cancer; IGF-IR; trastuzumab

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Spain [BFU2006-01813/BMC]
  2. Scientific Foundation of the Spanish Association for Cancer Research (AECC)
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI061552, CP04/00045]
  4. Spanish Cancer Centers Network Program [RD06/0020/0041]
  5. European Community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Receptor tyrosine kinases play an important role in breast cancer. One of them, the type I insulin-like growth factor, has been linked to resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin), an agent that targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Here, we show that the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) antagonist NVP-AEW541 inhibits proliferation of breast cancer cells and synergizes with trastuzumab. Patients and methods: Patient samples and breast cancer cell lines were evaluated for IGF-IR expression or activation by western blotting. 1-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenylformazan (MTT) uptake assays and Annexin V staining were used for the analyses of cell proliferation/apoptosis. Biochemical and genomic studies were carried out to gain insights into the mechanism of action of NVP-AEW541. Results: The IGF-IR was expressed above normal levels in a number of breast cancer samples. Activation of this receptor was inhibited by NVP-AEW541 that also decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. NVP-AEW541 decreased the amount of pAkt and increased the level of p27. Combination studies with several drugs used in the breast cancer clinic showed that NVP-AEW541 synergistically increased the action of trastuzumab. Conclusions: Our results show the anti-breast cancer action of NVP-AEW541 and support the clinical development of anti-IGF-IR agents, especially in combination with trastuzumab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据