4.7 Article

Iron and colorectal cancer risk in the α-tocopherol, β-carotene cancer prevention study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 118, 期 12, 页码 3147-3152

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21780

关键词

red meat; iron; colorectal cancer

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CN-45165] Funding Source: Medline
  2. CCR NIH HHS [N01-RC-45035, N01-RC-37004] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro and in vivo studies have associated iron with both the initiation and promotional stages of carcinogenesis. We investigated whether iron was associated with colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study within the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study cohort. Exposure was assessed at baseline, using a 276-item food frequency questionnaire and a fasting serum sample. The study included 130 colorectal cancer cases (73 colon cancers and 57 rectal cancers) and 260 controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Supplemental iron intake was only reported for 4 cases and 18 controls; therefore, we were unable to obtain meaningful results for this variable. Comparing the highest to the lowest quartiles, there was an inverse association between serum ferritin and colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9) and a suggestion of an inverse association between dietary iron and colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.1-1.1). In addition, serum ferritin, serum iron and transferrin saturation were all inversely associated with colon cancer risk specifically (OR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.14.7, p trend = 0.02; OR = 0.2, 95% 61 0.1-0.9, p trend = 0.05; OR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.02-0.5, p trend 0.003, respectively), whereas serum unsaturated iron binding capacity was positively associated with colon cancer risk (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.4-15.1, p trend = 0.009). In summary, we found a significant inverse association between several serum iron indices and colon cancer risk. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据